Powered By Blogger

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Walter Benjamin "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction

Assignment
Compare Benjamin and Jünger's views on photography. Why does Jünger refer to the camera as the "evil eye". How does Benjamin's views compare?       
            The view points of Junger and Benjamin are similar and different in others. In the terms of photography they are amazed at what can be caught in a camera. However the back ground on each author makes them somewhat apart. For example Junger mainly takes about photography via looking at pain, and Benjamin look at photography as a new technology and methods that the technology can be used.
            I think junger refers to the camera as a “evil eye” because his background. As I mentioned before that junger wrote about pain because he was in pain and saw how the new technology killed a lot more people more quickly and brutally. This is why junger refers to the camera as an “evil eye” however Benjamin’s view are different. I feel as if Benjamin feel that the camera is a more advantages was, but does not mean as much as picture did in the old days. He also see’s technology as a good things.        
           

Friday, December 16, 2011

Final

1)      B Friedrich Nietzsche
2)      D All of the above
3)      B The Reichstag fire
4)      C Max Weber
5)      C The leader of a slave revolt against the Romans
6)      A The voting of war credits by the Social Democratic Party in 1914
7)      C Ernst Jünger

8)      B Rosa Luxemburg

9)      A Rath

10)  B Francis is a patient at a mental institution

11)  A Walter Benjamin

12)  A Walter Benjamin

13)  B 1924-1929

14)  A Herman Hesse
15)  D KPD

16)  C November 11th, 1918

17)  D On the Genealogy of Morality

18)  C A nonsense word with no meaning

19)  D  Ernst Jünger

20)  B doctor

21)  B Munich

22)  C To increase the power of soldier’s and worker’s councils over military bases and factories

23)  A Max Weber

24)  D All of the above

25)  C air planes

26)  D Walter Benjamin



Final

Max Weber: Politics as a Vocation

Quote
“Above all, the Catholic Center party was enthusiastically for this draft. In Badenia, the party, as part of the party platform, made the distribution of offices proportional to confessions and hence without regard to achievement. This tendency becomes stronger for all parties when the number of offices increase as a result of general bureaucratization and when the demand for offices increases because they represent specifically secure livelihoods. For their followings, the parties become more and more a means to the end of being provided for in this manner.”
Meaning
This passage is talking about bureaucratization. What he is trying to say is that the specialization of a particular task within a government system is bureaucrat. For example as time goes on the world get more developed and new cabinets are formed to take care of the growing problem. One example of this In the united states is the creation of FIMA, Before hurricane Katrina there was no FIMA. After the hurricane and the effects of the ill prepared gulf created FIMA so the federal government can take care of the problem in a more specialized way.
I picked this quote because I think that speciation can be look at increase in technology because a new system is in place and this time of technology also relate to Junger’s thought regarding technology and how it can protect the human’s to resist pain.              

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Quiz 2

1.       Which critical event happened in January 1919 in Germany?
D. All of the above
2.  What article in the Weimar constitution gave the legal pretext to suspend liberty?
A. Article 48
3. Which political party was the most dominant after the German Revolution in 1918-1919?
C. Social Democratic Party (SPD)
4. What does Volk mean?
C. People
5. What are the three forms of domination (authority) that Weber Speaks of and describe what they are?’
A. Traditional Domination- rule by traditional elite: kings, feudalism, and sultanism
B. Charismatic Domination- rule by ‘gift of grace’ or heroic attributes: prophets and demagogues
C. Rational-Legal Domination- rule by legal statues and administrative procedure.

6. Weber Defines the State as …
D. an organization that monopolizes the use of force in a territory
7. What year did Hitler assume power in Germany?
C. 1933

Friday, December 2, 2011

Nazism

Nazism
Assignment 10
Assignment: Choose either a passage from this blog and write out the way in which we have done all the assignment 1) Quote; 2) Interpretation; 3) why you chose the quote. Or choose a scene from the movie, describe it, interpret it, and explain why you chose this scene.
Quote
“Although both companies claim they lost control of operations during the Nazi regime both companies still retained legal control throughout the Nazi era and benefited from the profits of these companies during and after the war without ever being asked to pay anything in reparations, the U.S government actually paid them after the war to repair damages to their facilities.”
Interpretation
                The Quote is basically saying that during world war two, Ford and General Motor owned production plants in Germany. These production plants produced trucks and other products for the Nazi regime. Ford and General Motors insisted that they lost control over the plants, but they did profit from the products that were produced. Having made profit at an unjust cost they did not make any payments to the countries that were at war with Germany. And the quote ends by saying that after the war the company got money to rebuild their companies from the government.     
why you chose the quote
                I want to start with saying that I had no idea that General Motor and Ford benefited from the war. Never have I ever heard anyone mentioned such a thing. Most of the time when we hear discussion about world war two we always here the fact that so many Jews died, and the fact that it was a “world war” (meaning spread out to so many continent, America, Asia, Europe and Africa), however I never heard any one mentioned that Ford and General Motor companies benefited. Not to say that the killing of a race should not be discussed about, but we should know the whole story of what happened not just one aspect. After reading this it make me think that if they benefited from the war then there had to be other companies that benefited from the war. This also makes me think and wonder who is making money from the wars that are going on right now. I don’t know, but I hope General motors and Ford made a lot of donations to people that were affected by the war. The things that makes me really mad is that first they say they lost control, but they still take all the profit and not pay any reparations and  then they get money from uncle Sam. That is ridicules because if you think about it those trucks that were produced transported material and war products to the Germany army and in turn those war material were used to kill US troops and then you hear that a US company took the profits its out of my scope to understand how they were allowed to do that.    

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Assignment 8 The Weimer Republic

Assignment: I am providing a link to the actual text of the Weimar Constitution. Please choose TWO sections, one from the first part on the structure of government, and a second from the section on rights. Please write out the passages, interpret the meaning of them and explain why you chose these passages.
Article 48If a state (8) does not fulfil the obligations laid upon it by the Reich constitution or the Reich laws, the Reich President may use armed force to cause it to oblige.
In case public safety is seriously threatened or disturbed, the Reich President may take the measures necessary to reestablish law and order, if necessary using armed force. In the pursuit of this aim he may suspend the civil rights described in articles 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124 and 154, partially or entirely.
The Reich President has to inform Reichstag immediately about all measures undertaken which are based on paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article. The measures have to be suspended immediately if Reichstag demands so.
If danger is imminent, the state government may, for their specific territory, implement steps as described in paragraph 2. These steps have to be suspended if so demanded by the Reich President or the Reichstag. Further details are provided by Reich law.

Article 51 (9)In case the Reich President is unavailable, he is briefly substituted by the Reich Chancellor. Is it a presumably longer lasting situation, his substitution has to be regulated by a Reich law.
The same applies in case a presidency ends prematurely, until the next election is held

Article 114The rights of the individual are inviolable. Limitation or deprivation of individual liberty is admissible only if based on laws.
Persons deprived of their liberty have to be notified, at the next day on the latest, by which authority and based on which reasons the deprivation of their liberty has been ordered; immediately they have to be given the opportunity to protest against the deprivation of liberty.


            Throughout my life I have always heard over and over again of the fact that there was World War 2, but I was never fully informed of the ground work and the environment that made world war possible, In other words brought Hitler to power. But after reading the essay by Rose Luxemburg “The Junius Pamphlet” and The Weimer Republic Constitution I can understand exactly how it was possible for Hitler to come to power.
            The Constitution itself as a whole was a well designed and compressive Constitution as stated by the professor. There a lot of similarities between the US Constitution and the Weimer Republic Constitution. For example, the government is divided in to Federal (Reich) and State (States) government and their relationship to the courts are similar. The senate (Reichstag), the President (Reich President) and the House of Representative (Reichsrat) are set up very similar way in both Constitutions.
            So the three passages that I chose are Article 48, 51, 114. Article 48 is the most interesting Article from the constitution because It allows the president to peaty much throw the construction in the trash in time where if feel that the state is not following the law and at time when it feel its citizens are in danger. And when those situations are president all the rights of citizens are lost and as the teacher explained the country is in a “state of Emergency” and the president could do whatever it wants. Now going on to Article 51, this is basically stating that in case the president is not able or not there to attend to his office the next person in line to take the role of president is the Chancellor. The last Article as I mention is Article 114. This and some other article after this article are basically giving rights and then saying, you have that right until the federal government take if away in certain situations.
            The reason I chose these articles are because they are the loop holes that Hitler used to come in to power and do what he was able to do. He came to power because the president at that time Died and Hitler was the chancellor and he end up becoming the president. Going back to the main theme of the class Nihilism, we can relate the fact that the currents party of that time did not do anything to use its power as stated in the Constitution to over throw the government by a 2/3 of a vote to replace the Chancellor.
            So I want to end by saying that, I guess it does not matter how good of a constitution you construct, if there are people elected that are bad, they will twist the constitution is a bad way and used it for the wrong reasons.     

Saturday, November 5, 2011

Assignment 7 The German Revolution of 1918-1919

Assignment 7 The German Revolution of 1918-1919
The world war today is demonstrably not only murder on a grand scale; it is also suicide of the working classes of Europe. The soldiers of socialism, the proletarians of England, France, Germany, Russia, and Belgium have for months been killing one another at the behest of capital
            The passage above means that the World War (the first one) is only destroying the “Proletarians” (or the working class). It does not matter who win or loses the war, the real losers are the working class. The author Rosa Luxemburg goes on to explain that it is just the not proletarian of Germany that are losing, but all the Proletarian form all the countries are losing and the winner of the war are the bourgeoisie (the rich class or the class with power). The author blames that money, capital and imperialist values for the bourgeoisies are what the World War came to be, and the defense of the people of the each country as they expressed.
                The reason that I choose this passage is because this states the main point of the author. The author starts of with blaming the SPD (Social Democratic Party) for the reason Germany was able to engage in the world war. Then the author explains how the SPD had betrayed the working class, because they were supposed to be standing representing the working class. But instead they kept the working class in the dark, by not telling the real situation and voting for the war credit and persuaded the working class that they are being attacked and they must defend their father land.
                One thing that surprised me was that Marx had prophesized about the world War and event with that prophesize the working class was not able to doge the bullet. Another thing that surprise is that in essence they all knew that there would be a world war because they had been building their armies and navy and they the (both sides) did not do anything major to stop the war or restrict the built up of the armies and navy, so that there would not be such a loose of human life.  

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Assignment 6 Midterm

4) Explain the statement, "boredom is nothing other than the dissolution of pain in time", (Jünger p. 13) and its relationship to nihilism

5) How is technology and the technological organization of life a response to nihilism according to Jünger? How is the integration of technology and humanity negatively depicted in Dada art?


            As we know all know that nihilism is the complete break away from the past values and thought system and create new and improved values and thought system that better suit the new time. The example that the teacher talked about in the class blog, which was mentioned by Nietzsche is on Christianity and other belief systems. As the teacher states “Instead, what Nietzsche says is that nihilism is in Christianity and other traditional belief systems, in that they secretly contain a desire to destroy life. Nietzsche would point to the severe moral standards of Christian belief, what is referred to as asceticism as evidence of this. In his view, these moral beliefs were completely incompatible with our "life-affirming" vital instincts, and to that extent they were nihilistic in that were against "life"” (Murdaco. August 2011). This is an example of what nihilism is and not the actual concept. Having established an understanding of the concept of nihilism is, I will direct my focus on the main part of my essay. I will divide my essay in to four parts. In the first part of my essay I will explain how the meaning of the statement “boredom is nothing other than the dissolution of pain in time” (Junger.p13), which was sad by Ernst Junger in his essay “On Pain”. In the second part of my essay I will talk about how this statement is relates to the concept of nihilism. In the third part of my essay I will explain the relationship between technology and the technological organization to nihilism from the view point of Ernst Junger. In the last part of my essay I will explore how the integration of technology and humanity is negatively depicted in Dada art.  
            In order to fully understand the meaning of the Quote “boredom is nothing other than the dissolution of pain in time” (Junger.P13), we must understand the meaning of pain with regards to the concept of nihilism. We know that nihilism is the brake away from traditional values to form new values. Now we need to know how pain is considered in terms of new values. This can be best understood for the statement from the professor in the class blog which states “The existence of pain contradicts the dominant values of liberal society which holds out the myth that good will always triumph over evil” (Mudaco, October 2011). What this mean is that the time this essay was written the traditional thought was that good will always prevail, but in reality that is not the case. There are cases where bad things happen and innocent people who end up getting hurt, and these bad things cause pain and suffering to human kind, and no matter what we do we cannot stop thing pain. So now we know that the traditional thought was that we will be protect by bad thing and not feel the suffering and pain, but in reality we will and thing is the new thought or you can consider this values to better relate to nihilism. So going back to the quote, which is basically saying that we cannot break away from pain? Boredom is the state to being bored and dissolution mean break, so the quote is saying that when we are board we are disconnected with pain at that time, but once we come back to reality pain is just waiting right there wait for us. So his is the meaning of the quote to the relationship to pain.
            Now I will talk about how this relates to nihilism. In a sense I have already answer that question, but I will sum but main point from the previous paragraph. So recalling back, we know that pain was the new way of thought and not getting in contact with pain was the old way of thought and this is what essential nihilism is. In the introduction I explained that the example by Nietzsche was on Christianity and this example by Ernst Junger is on pain.
            Keeping the two things that I mentioned above in mind we can expand on them and answer the next part of my essay. So we know that Nietzsche example on nihilism was based on Christianity and Junger example was based on Pain. Where there ideas change is how the end result would be. In Nietzsche example the end result would be that a super person will come and change our values, however Junger disagrees. He suggests that technology will help us cope with the pain. As Junger states in his essay “The growing objectification of our life appears most distinctly in technology, this great mirror, which is sealed off in a unique way from the grip of pain. Technology is our uniform” (Junger 2008.p31) supports what I said. That with the use of technology we will harden out self’s and be able to better with stand pain.
            Now I will talk a little about how integration of technology and humanity is negatively depicted in dada art. To start thing off I wasn’t to give a little explanation of the dada movement was about. Then I will look at a couple of pictures from the dada time period that show the negative depiction in dada art. The dada movement happened in Germany after WW2 and we know that Germany lost the war and had to take full responsibility of the war. Do to his the economic conditions were bad and this lead to the movement of dada. As stated by the professor dada movement was “…an artistic movement that self-consciously styled itself as "anti-art" or art that defies conventional notions of artistic beauty and correctness. (Murdaco. September 2011). So the dada artist made picture that put down all the parties that supported the war. One such picture is this one.              
           
            You can see that there are both human and machine feature present in the picture. They are put in a way that the finished work looks awkward, and this was the goal. The dada artist wanted to show that nothing make sense from the current values and in order to create new values the old once had to be destroyed. So in a sense this picture is trying to do this. Here is another picture that shows the same features.     
  

            You can see that there are all sort of small tools and part in the picture and one of the tool in holding up the dead of the man. The art is so arbitrary and as the professor explains that they are "anti-art"(Murdaco. September 2011). This is how technology and negatively depicted is the dada art work.
            I would like to conclude with giving a little expiation with regards to where everything stands with respect to time. I will start off with Nietzsche. Nietzsche was born in 1844 and died in 1900. At the end of his death the concept of nihilism was developed with the example being the Christian values. Then came along Ernst Junger, he was born in 1895 and died in 1998. He wrote the essay “On Pain” in 1934 at the time when Hitler came to power. So we could see why the two had a different end to the concept of nihilism. At the time of Nietzsche the was not much technology and during Junger’s time there were tanks submarine and a lot more technological advanced and gave a different conclusion. To finalize my essay I want to say that between WW1 to WW2 the concept of nihilism was played out in Germany because the German wanted to break away from the past because they had just lost the war and had to accept all responsibility of the war. This suffering that came in to effect after the first war was the reason to break away for the traditional way of thought. This is how nihilism relates to Germany.             




















Reference List
Murdaco, Barry. (2011, August 26). Nihilism in Germany http://nihilismlehman.blogspot.com/2011/08/826-introduction.html
Junger, Ernst:translated and introduced by Durst, David C, Preface Berman, Russel A, 2008, On Pain, New York, Telos Press Publishing.

Assignment 6 Midterm

4) Explain the statement, "boredom is nothing other than the dissolution of pain in time", (Jünger p. 13) and its relationship to nihilism

5) How is technology and the technological organization of life a response to nihilism according to Jünger? How is the integration of technology and humanity negatively depicted in Dada art?


            As we know all know that nihilism is the complete break away from the past values and thought system and create new and improved values and thought system that better suit the new time. The example that the teacher talked about in the class blog, which was mentioned by Nietzsche is on Christianity and other belief systems. As the teacher states “Instead, what Nietzsche says is that nihilism is in Christianity and other traditional belief systems, in that they secretly contain a desire to destroy life. Nietzsche would point to the severe moral standards of Christian belief, what is referred to as asceticism as evidence of this. In his view, these moral beliefs were completely incompatible with our "life-affirming" vital instincts, and to that extent they were nihilistic in that were against "life"” (Murdaco. August 2011). This is an example of what nihilism is and not the actual concept. Having established an understanding of the concept of nihilism is, I will direct my focus on the main part of my essay. I will divide my essay in to four parts. In the first part of my essay I will explain how the meaning of the statement “boredom is nothing other than the dissolution of pain in time” (Junger.p13), which was sad by Ernst Junger in his essay “On Pain”. In the second part of my essay I will talk about how this statement is relates to the concept of nihilism. In the third part of my essay I will explain the relationship between technology and the technological organization to nihilism from the view point of Ernst Junger. In the last part of my essay I will explore how the integration of technology and humanity is negatively depicted in Dada art.  
            In order to fully understand the meaning of the Quote “boredom is nothing other than the dissolution of pain in time” (Junger.P13), we must understand the meaning of pain with regards to the concept of nihilism. We know that nihilism is the brake away from traditional values to form new values. Now we need to know how pain is considered in terms of new values. This can be best understood for the statement from the professor in the class blog which states “The existence of pain contradicts the dominant values of liberal society which holds out the myth that good will always triumph over evil” (Mudaco, October 2011). What this mean is that the time this essay was written the traditional thought was that good will always prevail, but in reality that is not the case. There are cases where bad things happen and innocent people who end up getting hurt, and these bad things cause pain and suffering to human kind, and no matter what we do we cannot stop thing pain. So now we know that the traditional thought was that we will be protect by bad thing and not feel the suffering and pain, but in reality we will and thing is the new thought or you can consider this values to better relate to nihilism. So going back to the quote, which is basically saying that we cannot break away from pain? Boredom is the state to being bored and dissolution mean break, so the quote is saying that when we are board we are disconnected with pain at that time, but once we come back to reality pain is just waiting right there wait for us. So his is the meaning of the quote to the relationship to pain.
            Now I will talk about how this relates to nihilism. In a sense I have already answer that question, but I will sum but main point from the previous paragraph. So recalling back, we know that pain was the new way of thought and not getting in contact with pain was the old way of thought and this is what essential nihilism is. In the introduction I explained that the example by Nietzsche was on Christianity and this example by Ernst Junger is on pain.
            Keeping the two things that I mentioned above in mind we can expand on them and answer the next part of my essay. So we know that Nietzsche example on nihilism was based on Christianity and Junger example was based on Pain. Where there ideas change is how the end result would be. In Nietzsche example the end result would be that a super person will come and change our values, however Junger disagrees. He suggests that technology will help us cope with the pain. As Junger states in his essay “The growing objectification of our life appears most distinctly in technology, this great mirror, which is sealed off in a unique way from the grip of pain. Technology is our uniform” (Junger 2008.p31) supports what I said. That with the use of technology we will harden out self’s and be able to better with stand pain.
            Now I will talk a little about how integration of technology and humanity is negatively depicted in dada art. To start thing off I wasn’t to give a little explanation of the dada movement was about. Then I will look at a couple of pictures from the dada time period that show the negative depiction in dada art. The dada movement happened in Germany after WW2 and we know that Germany lost the war and had to take full responsibility of the war. Do to his the economic conditions were bad and this lead to the movement of dada. As stated by the professor dada movement was “…an artistic movement that self-consciously styled itself as "anti-art" or art that defies conventional notions of artistic beauty and correctness. (Murdaco. September 2011). So the dada artist made picture that put down all the parties that supported the war. One such picture is this one.              
           
            You can see that there are both human and machine feature present in the picture. They are put in a way that the finished work looks awkward, and this was the goal. The dada artist wanted to show that nothing make sense from the current values and in order to create new values the old once had to be destroyed. So in a sense this picture is trying to do this. Here is another picture that shows the same features.     
  

            You can see that there are all sort of small tools and part in the picture and one of the tool in holding up the dead of the man. The art is so arbitrary and as the professor explains that they are "anti-art"(Murdaco. September 2011). This is how technology and negatively depicted is the dada art work.
            I would like to conclude with giving a little expiation with regards to where everything stands with respect to time. I will start off with Nietzsche. Nietzsche was born in 1844 and died in 1900. At the end of his death the concept of nihilism was developed with the example being the Christian values. Then came along Ernst Junger, he was born in 1895 and died in 1998. He wrote the essay “On Pain” in 1934 at the time when Hitler came to power. So we could see why the two had a different end to the concept of nihilism. At the time of Nietzsche the was not much technology and during Junger’s time there were tanks submarine and a lot more technological advanced and gave a different conclusion. To finalize my essay I want to say that between WW1 to WW2 the concept of nihilism was played out in Germany because the German wanted to break away from the past because they had just lost the war and had to accept all responsibility of the war. This suffering that came in to effect after the first war was the reason to break away for the traditional way of thought. This is how nihilism relates to Germany.             




















Reference List
Murdaco, Barry. (2011, August 26). Nihilism in Germany http://nihilismlehman.blogspot.com/2011/08/826-introduction.html
Junger, Ernst:translated and introduced by Durst, David C, Preface Berman, Russel A, 2008, On Pain, New York, Telos Press Publishing.

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Assignment 5

Assignment: Please choose a passage from the essay on one of the following themes; pain, technology, photography, detachment, sexuality. Write out the passage. Interpret the passage and explain how it relates to one of the other works we have looked at. Explain why you choose this passage.

“This examination would not be complete, however, if it did not touch upon a third and colder order that bestows its unique character on our time of change. The growing objectification of our life appears most distinctly in technology, this great mirror, which is sealed off in a unique way from the grip of pain. Technology is our uniform.”(P31)
                This is when Ernst Junger is taking about pain, and how as new technology is coming it is make us more harden and resistance to pain. He is trying to explain that as the world moves away from the old traditional values and embrace the new world, with technology, which is make us better sustain pain. The theme that am focusing on is pain. This relates to the “Blue Angle” because it expresses Ernst Junger and Nietzsche’s view of the fact that pain is increasing as we move away from traditional way of thought. The way this relates to Rath in “Blue Angle” is because Rath moves away from the traditional way of being a respectable professor to marrying Lola and ended up endeavoring more pain.  

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Assignment 4 Dream stroy

Please choose a quote from Dream Story write out the quote. Then interpret the quote and explain why you choose this passage. 
“Nachtigall sighed softly. ‘Well, no t completely blindfolded, admittedly. Not so that I can’t see anything at all. That is, I can see things in the mirror through the black silk scarf tied over my eyes...’ And again he paused. ‘In a word,’ said Fridolin impatiently and little scornfully but felling strangely excited, ‘naked females.’ ‘Don’t call them females, Fridolin,’ replied Nachtigall in an offended tone, ‘you’ve never seen such women.’ Fridolin cleared his throath lightly. ‘And how high is the entrance fee?’” P35
                This quote is from the 35th page of the 4th chapter. This is when Fridolin meets Nachtigall in the coffee shop and they talk about how their lives have gone on since the last time they met. As they are done about telling about their lives, Nachtigall tell that is giving his serves to a secret private group. He further explains that there is danger there beautiful women at this particular place. As soon as Fridolin hears about this he wanted to know how he could get in. later Fridolin finds that he has to wear a mask and costume to enter with a password.
                The reason I choose this passage from the book “Dream Story” is because this story’s theme of irrational behavior is similar almost all of the works we have read or saw in our previous classes. Another reason that I have chosen this part of the book is because that is what we are studying. What I mean by this is Nihilism. As we know that Nihilism according to Friedrich Nietzsche is the movement away for the traditional way of live and traditional morals and values to the irrational way thought. He also said that that is what we need to like a full and healthy life.
                In summary, 3 out of 4 works that we have read or watched have showed the theme of irrational. The first is “Siddhartha”. The fact that Siddhartha went from a person staying away from women to have pleasure with Kamala. In the second major work that we watched “The Cabinet of Dr.Caligari” in that I thought that I did not see much of the irrational behavior except the relationship with Francis and Jane. So I will not consider that irrational. The third work that we watched “The Blue Angle” clearly shows the irrational behavior of Rath with Lola. In the book we read for this week “Dream Story” also shows the same theme.
                Having said this I want to point out that the first part of Friedrich Nietzsche’s theory I get and that is that we are bound to take the irrational path. Although I don’t get how this path could be a healthy and let a person live a full life, because all the victim either left that path in the case of Siddhartha, or went to a worse situation in the case of Roth, or stayed the same the same in the case of Fridolin.               
                      

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Assignment

Assignment
            The three themes that I would say are in both “The Blue Angel” and “Cabinet of Dr. Caligari” are madness, darkness, creepiness. You can clearly see the madness in both films. In Dr. Carligari’s video the madness is the person in the cabinet and his relationship with Dr.Carligari. when the police come to look for the person in the cabinet Dr. Caligari tries to stop them so that is the madness in the first film. In the next film the madness is the fact that the professor goes stop his students from going the wrong path and ends up going to that irrational path himself.
            The darkness is also displayed in both film and for the first film I would say that the fact that you got a person that in the cabinet. You could also see the dankness on the face of the person who was in the cabinet. Another example is when the movie ended you saw the person in the prison and the doors were closed on him. The second movie prorates this theme because most of the movie takes place at night. You could also see the fact that in the day time the professor was rational and his irrational behavior were expressed in the dark.
            The third theme of creepiness is displayed in the film because of the person on the cabinet. It even gets creepier when the police come to find the suspect and they can’t seem to wake him up. In the second film the blue angel the creepiness is prorated in two character and those are the clown and the professor. The clown just popping in the film for no reason, and he does not say anything. So his behavior and the fact that he is a clown make his Creepy. The professor is creepy because I thought he was given the position of the clown. If you think about you don’t even see the clown, so I kind of felt that maybe the clown went something like what the professor was going through.
            Over all speaking I think this relates to the theme of nihilism in the blue angel because as the teacher mentioned that the behavior of professor Rath going after lust and end up killing himself. The theme of madness relate to nihilism by the fact that you are moving away from the traditional way of behavior and that is madness in the eyes of peoples norm. The theme of darkness relates to nihilism because you could say that if you are irrational you are going toward the dark.           

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Nihilism in Germany: Blog Links

Nihilism in Germany: Blog Links: Please post the link for your blog here. First, Copy and paste the link for your blog where it says post a comment. Click on post a comment...http://ngwtclass.blogspot.com/

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

Q1. What is Nihilism? Is it correct to say it is the belief in nothing?
A1. According to Nietzsche nihilism Is the concepts that states all belief system, not just Christians belief systems have within them a secret desire to destroy like and that these old belief systems and the values that they carry will be replaced with new ones that have better values that suite the new time. I don’t think that it is safe to say that nihilism is the belief in nothing.
Q2. What is the difference between Greco-Roman and Judeo- Christian values According to Nietzsche? What values does he believe are better for living a full and healthy life and why?
A2. Nietzsche believed that these two belief system were completely opposite of each other. For that time he believed that the Roman values were better suited. He said that the Christian were kind of haters that they set up their belief system because they want to go against them.
Q3. Why is Dada art so pessimistic and bizarre? What groups in Germany society were dada artists trying to discredit and underline?
A3. The dada art is so pessimistic and bizarre because they were trying to destroy the old cultures. They were trying to discredit the military, nationalist, the middle class and all the other that created the war and those that  did not do anything to stop the war. So this was a way to destroy those people.
Q4. How many jobs does Dr. Caligari have in the film?
A4. At first I thought he had only one job, and that was to play around with Cesare, meaning in the Consecution. Then I got lost because late on in the movie the was a guy that was saying Dr. Caligari was in the Doctor office. So I got confused, but I thing that he only had 1 job.
Q5. Why does Siddhartha leave his father?
 A5. Siddhartha leaves his father because he want to find salvation, and he could not find salvation in his religion that he was practicing at that time. He had learn all that there was of his first religion and thought that he will practice his religion all his life and will not find salvation so he want to see If the Samanas religion could provide that.
Q6.How does Cesare “die” in the film?
A6. I am not sure what you mean by that.  What I recall is that the police came and got Cesare and they put him in the Cell and then someone came and that they found him dead, or maybe DR. Caligari killed him. I am not sure. I really couldn’t fully understand what was going on in the movie.
Q7.Why is the river so important to Siddhartha at the end of the novel?
Q7. The river is so important to Siddhartha because he see that that the river Is connected in a cycle. For example the rain come down to the stream and then to the river and then does down the river and  then becomes rain again. Another reason that the river is so important because it has lead his to the right path and he has found salvation from it. On top of that the river tell him what is right and wrong for example the river told him not to go and get his son. The fact that he has learned so much from the river  and he compares the river to a god is why the river is important to him


Friday, September 16, 2011

assiment 2

Assignment 2
GOVINDA
Together with other monks, Govinda used to spend the time of rest between pilgrimages in the pleasure-grove, which the courtesan Kamala had given to the followers of Gotama for a gift. He heard talk of an old ferryman, who lived one day's journey away by the river, and who was regarded as a wise man by many. When Govinda went back on his way, he chose the path to the ferry, eager to see the ferryman. Because, though he had lived his entire life by the rules, though he was also looked upon with veneration by the younger monks on account of his age and his modesty, the restlessness and the searching still had not perished from his heart.
He came to the river and asked the old man to ferry him over, and when they got off the boat on the other side, he said to the old man: "You're very good to us monks and pilgrims, you have already ferried many of us across the river. Aren't you too, ferryman, a searcher for the right path?"
Quoth Siddhartha, smiling from his old eyes: "Do you call yourself a searcher, oh venerable one, though you are already of an old in years and are wearing the robe of Gotama's monks?"
"It's true, I'm old," spoke Govinda, "but I haven't stopped searching. Never I'll stop searching, this seems to be my destiny. You too, so it seems to me, have been searching. Would you like to tell me something, oh honourable one?"
Quoth Siddhartha: "What should I possibly have to tell you, oh venerable one? Perhaps that you're searching far too much? That in all that searching, you don't find the time for finding?"
"How come?" asked Govinda.
"When someone is searching," said Siddhartha, "then it might easily happen that the only thing his eyes still see is that what he searches for, that he is unable to find anything, to let anything enter his mind, because he always thinks of nothing but the object of his search, because he has a goal, because he is obsessed by the goal. Searching means: having a goal. But finding means: being free, being open, having no goal. You, oh venerable one, are perhaps indeed a searcher, because, striving for your goal, there are many things you don't see, which are directly in front of your eyes."
"I don't quite understand yet," asked Govinda, "what do you mean by this?"
Quoth Siddhartha: "A long time ago, oh venerable one, many years ago, you've once before been at this river and have found a sleeping man by the river, and have sat down with him to guard his sleep. But, oh Govinda, you did not recognise the sleeping man."
Astonished, as if he had been the object of a magic spell, the monk looked into the ferryman's eyes.
"Are you Siddhartha?" he asked with a timid voice. "I wouldn't have recognised you this time as well! From my heart, I'm greeting you, Siddhartha; from my heart, I'm happy to see you once again! You've changed a lot, my friend.—And so you've now become a ferryman?"
In a friendly manner, Siddhartha laughed. "A ferryman, yes. Many people, Govinda, have to change a lot, have to wear many a robe, I am one of those, my dear. Be welcome, Govinda, and spend the night in my hut."
Govinda stayed the night in the hut and slept on the bed which used to be Vasudeva's bed. Many questions he posed to the friend of his youth, many things Siddhartha had to tell him from his life.
When in the next morning the time had come to start the day's journey, Govinda said, not without hesitation, these words: "Before I'll continue on my path, Siddhartha, permit me to ask one more question. Do you have a teaching? Do you have a faith, or a knowledge, you follow, which helps you to live and to do right?"
Quoth Siddhartha: "You know, my dear, that I already as a young man, in those days when we lived with the penitents in the forest, started to distrust teachers and teachings and to turn my back to them. I have stuck with this. Nevertheless, I have had many teachers since then. A beautiful courtesan has been my teacher for a long time, and a rich merchant was my teacher, and some gamblers with dice. Once, even a follower of Buddha, travelling on foot, has been my teacher; he sat with me when I had fallen asleep in the forest, on the pilgrimage. I've also learned from him, I'm also grateful to him, very grateful. But most of all, I have learned here from this river and from my predecessor, the ferryman Vasudeva. He was a very simple person, Vasudeva, he was no thinker, but he knew what is necessary just as well as Gotama, he was a perfect man, a saint."
Govinda said: "Still, oh Siddhartha, you love a bit to mock people, as it seems to me. I believe in you and know that you haven't followed a teacher. But haven't you found something by yourself, though you've found no teachings, you still found certain thoughts, certain insights, which are your own and which help you to live? If you would like to tell me some of these, you would delight my heart."
Quoth Siddhartha: "I've had thoughts, yes, and insight, again and again. Sometimes, for an hour or for an entire day, I have felt knowledge in me, as one would feel life in one's heart. There have been many thoughts, but it would be hard for me to convey them to you. Look, my dear Govinda, this is one of my thoughts, which I have found: wisdom cannot be passed on. Wisdom which a wise man tries to pass on to someone always sounds like foolishness."
"Are you kidding?" asked Govinda.
"I'm not kidding. I'm telling you what I've found. Knowledge can be conveyed, but not wisdom. It can be found, it can be lived, it is possible to be carried by it, miracles can be performed with it, but it cannot be expressed in words and taught. This was what I, even as a young man, sometimes suspected, what has driven me away from the teachers. I have found a thought, Govinda, which you'll again regard as a joke or foolishness, but which is my best thought. It says: The opposite of every truth is just as true! That's like this: any truth can only be expressed and put into words when it is one-sided. Everything is one-sided which can be thought with thoughts and said with words, it's all one-sided, all just one half, all lacks completeness, roundness, oneness. When the exalted Gotama spoke in his teachings of the world, he had to divide it into Sansara and Nirvana, into deception and truth, into suffering and salvation. It cannot be done differently, there is no other way for him who wants to teach. But the world itself, what exists around us and inside of us, is never one-sided. A person or an act is never entirely Sansara or entirely Nirvana, a person is never entirely holy or entirely sinful. It does really seem like this, because we are subject to deception, as if time was something real. Time is not real, Govinda, I have experienced this often and often again. And if time is not real, then the gap which seems to be between the world and the eternity, between suffering and blissfulness, between evil and good, is also a deception."
"How come?" asked Govinda timidly.
"Listen well, my dear, listen well! The sinner, which I am and which you are, is a sinner, but in times to come he will be Brahma again, he will reach the Nirvana, will be Buddha—and now see: these 'times to come' are a deception, are only a parable! The sinner is not on his way to become a Buddha, he is not in the process of developing, though our capacity for thinking does not know how else to picture these things. No, within the sinner is now and today already the future Buddha, his future is already all there, you have to worship in him, in you, in everyone the Buddha which is coming into being, the possible, the hidden Buddha. The world, my friend Govinda, is not imperfect, or on a slow path towards perfection: no, it is perfect in every moment, all sin already carries the divine forgiveness in itself, all small children already have the old person in themselves, all infants already have death, all dying people the eternal life. It is not possible for any person to see how far another one has already progressed on his path; in the robber and dice-gambler, the Buddha is waiting; in the Brahman, the robber is waiting. In deep meditation, there is the possibility to put time out of existence, to see all life which was, is, and will be as if it was simultaneous, and there everything is good, everything is perfect, everything is Brahman. Therefore, I see whatever exists as good, death is to me like life, sin like holiness, wisdom like foolishness, everything has to be as it is, everything only requires my consent, only my willingness, my loving agreement, to be good for me, to do nothing but work for my benefit, to be unable to ever harm me. I have experienced on my body and on my soul that I needed sin very much, I needed lust, the desire for possessions, vanity, and needed the most shameful despair, in order to learn how to give up all resistance, in order to learn how to love the world, in order to stop comparing it to some world I wished, I imagined, some kind of perfection I had made up, but to leave it as it is and to love it and to enjoy being a part of it.—These, oh Govinda, are some of the thoughts which have come into my mind."
Siddhartha bent down, picked up a stone from the ground, and weighed it in his hand.
"This here," he said playing with it, "is a stone, and will, after a certain time, perhaps turn into soil, and will turn from soil into a plant or animal or human being. In the past, I would have said: This stone is just a stone, it is worthless, it belongs to the world of the Maja; but because it might be able to become also a human being and a spirit in the cycle of transformations, therefore I also grant it importance. Thus, I would perhaps have thought in the past. But today I think: this stone is a stone, it is also animal, it is also god, it is also Buddha, I do not venerate and love it because it could turn into this or that, but rather because it is already and always everything— and it is this very fact, that it is a stone, that it appears to me now and today as a stone, this is why I love it and see worth and purpose in each of its veins and cavities, in the yellow, in the gray, in the hardness, in the sound it makes when I knock at it, in the dryness or wetness of its surface. There are stones which feel like oil or soap, and others like leaves, others like sand, and every one is special and prays the Om in its own way, each one is Brahman, but simultaneously and just as much it is a stone, is oily or juicy, and this is this very fact which I like and regard as wonderful and worthy of worship.—But let me speak no more of this. The words are not good for the secret meaning, everything always becomes a bit different, as soon as it is put into words, gets distorted a bit, a bit silly—yes, and this is also very good, and I like it a lot, I also very much agree with this, that this what is one man's treasure and wisdom always sounds like foolishness to another person."
Govinda listened silently.
"Why have you told me this about the stone?" he asked hesitantly after a pause.
"I did it without any specific intention. Or perhaps what I meant was, that love this very stone, and the river, and all these things we are looking at and from which we can learn. I can love a stone, Govinda, and also a tree or a piece of bark. This are things, and things can be loved. But I cannot love words. Therefore, teachings are no good for me, they have no hardness, no softness, no colours, no edges, no smell, no taste, they have nothing but words. Perhaps it are these which keep you from finding peace, perhaps it are the many words. Because salvation and virtue as well, Sansara and Nirvana as well, are mere words, Govinda. There is no thing which would be Nirvana; there is just the word Nirvana."
Quoth Govinda: "Not just a word, my friend, is Nirvana. It is a thought."
Siddhartha continued: "A thought, it might be so. I must confess to you, my dear: I don't differentiate much between thoughts and words. To be honest, I also have no high opinion of thoughts. I have a better opinion of things. Here on this ferry-boat, for instance, a man has been my predecessor and teacher, a holy man, who has for many years simply believed in the river, nothing else. He had noticed that the river's spoke to him, he learned from it, it educated and taught him, the river seemed to be a god to him, for many years he did not know that every wind, every cloud, every bird, every beetle was just as divine and knows just as much and can teach just as much as the worshipped river. But when this holy man went into the forests, he knew everything, knew more than you and me, without teachers, without books, only because he had believed in the river."
Govinda said: "But is that what you call `things', actually something real, something which has existence? Isn't it just a deception of the Maja, just an image and illusion? Your stone, your tree, your river— are they actually a reality?"
"This too," spoke Siddhartha, "I do not care very much about. Let the things be illusions or not, after all I would then also be an illusion, and thus they are always like me. This is what makes them so dear and worthy of veneration for me: they are like me. Therefore, I can love them. And this is now a teaching you will laugh about: love, oh Govinda, seems to me to be the most important thing of all. To thoroughly understand the world, to explain it, to despise it, may be the thing great thinkers do. But I'm only interested in being able to love the world, not to despise it, not to hate it and me, to be able to look upon it and me and all beings with love and admiration and great respect."
"This I understand," spoke Govinda. "But this very thing was discovered by the exalted one to be a deception. He commands benevolence, clemency, sympathy, tolerance, but not love; he forbade us to tie our heart in love to earthly things."
"I know it," said Siddhartha; his smile shone golden. "I know it, Govinda. And behold, with this we are right in the middle of the thicket of opinions, in the dispute about words. For I cannot deny, my words of love are in a contradiction, a seeming contradiction with Gotama's words. For this very reason, I distrust in words so much, for I know, this contradiction is a deception. I know that I am in agreement with Gotama. How should he not know love, he, who has discovered all elements of human existence in their transitoriness, in their meaninglessness, and yet loved people thus much, to use a long, laborious life only to help them, to teach them! Even with him, even with your great teacher, I prefer the thing over the words, place more importance on his acts and life than on his speeches, more on the gestures of his hand than his opinions. Not in his speech, not in his thoughts, I see his greatness, only in his actions, in his life."
For a long time, the two old men said nothing. Then spoke Govinda, while bowing for a farewell: "I thank you, Siddhartha, for telling me some of your thoughts. They are partially strange thoughts, not all have been instantly understandable to me. This being as it may, I thank you, and I wish you to have calm days."
(But secretly he thought to himself: This Siddhartha is a bizarre person, he expresses bizarre thoughts, his teachings sound foolish. So differently sound the exalted one's pure teachings, clearer, purer, more comprehensible, nothing strange, foolish, or silly is contained in them. But different from his thoughts seemed to me Siddhartha's hands and feet, his eyes, his forehead, his breath, his smile, his greeting, his walk. Never again, after our exalted Gotama has become one with the Nirvana, never since then have I met a person of whom I felt: this is a holy man! Only him, this Siddhartha, I have found to be like this. May his teachings be strange, may his words sound foolish; out of his gaze and his hand, his skin and his hair, out of every part of him shines a purity, shines a calmness, shines a cheerfulness and mildness and holiness, which I have seen in no other person since the final death of our exalted teacher.)
As Govinda thought like this, and there was a conflict in his heart, he once again bowed to Siddhartha, drawn by love. Deeply he bowed to him who was calmly sitting.
"Siddhartha," he spoke, "we have become old men. It is unlikely for one of us to see the other again in this incarnation. I see, beloved, that you have found peace. I confess that I haven't found it. Tell me, oh honourable one, one more word, give me something on my way which I can grasp, which I can understand! Give me something to be with me on my path. It it often hard, my path, often dark, Siddhartha."
Siddhartha said nothing and looked at him with the ever unchanged, quiet smile. Govinda stared at his face, with fear, with yearning, suffering, and the eternal search was visible in his look, eternal not-finding.
Siddhartha saw it and smiled.
"Bent down to me!" he whispered quietly in Govinda's ear. "Bend down to me! Like this, even closer! Very close! Kiss my forehead, Govinda!"
But while Govinda with astonishment, and yet drawn by great love and expectation, obeyed his words, bent down closely to him and touched his forehead with his lips, something miraculous happened to him. While his thoughts were still dwelling on Siddhartha's wondrous words, while he was still struggling in vain and with reluctance to think away time, to imagine Nirvana and Sansara as one, while even a certain contempt for the words of his friend was fighting in him against an immense love and veneration, this happened to him:
He no longer saw the face of his friend Siddhartha, instead he saw other faces, many, a long sequence, a flowing river of faces, of hundreds, of thousands, which all came and disappeared, and yet all seemed to be there simultaneously, which all constantly changed and renewed themselves, and which were still all Siddhartha. He saw the face of a fish, a carp, with an infinitely painfully opened mouth, the face of a dying fish, with fading eyes—he saw the face of a new-born child, red and full of wrinkles, distorted from crying—he saw the face of a murderer, he saw him plunging a knife into the body of another person—he saw, in the same second, this criminal in bondage, kneeling and his head being chopped off by the executioner with one blow of his sword—he saw the bodies of men and women, naked in positions and cramps of frenzied love—he saw corpses stretched out, motionless, cold, void— he saw the heads of animals, of boars, of crocodiles, of elephants, of bulls, of birds—he saw gods, saw Krishna, saw Agni—he saw all of these figures and faces in a thousand relationships with one another, each one helping the other, loving it, hating it, destroying it, giving re-birth to it, each one was a will to die, a passionately painful confession of transitoriness, and yet none of them died, each one only transformed, was always re-born, received evermore a new face, without any time having passed between the one and the other face—and all of these figures and faces rested, flowed, generated themselves, floated along and merged with each other, and they were all constantly covered by something thin, without individuality of its own, but yet existing, like a thin glass or ice, like a transparent skin, a shell or mold or mask of water, and this mask was smiling, and this mask was Siddhartha's smiling face, which he, Govinda, in this very same moment touched with his lips. And, Govinda saw it like this, this smile of the mask, this smile of oneness above the flowing forms, this smile of simultaneousness above the thousand births and deaths, this smile of Siddhartha was precisely the same, was precisely of the same kind as the quiet, delicate, impenetrable, perhaps benevolent, perhaps mocking, wise, thousand-fold smile of Gotama, the Buddha, as he had seen it himself with great respect a hundred times. Like this, Govinda knew, the perfected ones are smiling.
Not knowing any more whether time existed, whether the vision had lasted a second or a hundred years, not knowing any more whether there existed a Siddhartha, a Gotama, a me and a you, feeling in his innermost self as if he had been wounded by a divine arrow, the injury of which tasted sweet, being enchanted and dissolved in his innermost self, Govinda still stood for a little while bent over Siddhartha's quiet face, which he had just kissed, which had just been the scene of all manifestations, all transformations, all existence. The face was unchanged, after under its surface the depth of the thousandfoldness had closed up again, he smiled silently, smiled quietly and softly, perhaps very benevolently, perhaps very mockingly, precisely as he used to smile, the exalted one.
Deeply, Govinda bowed; tears he knew nothing of, ran down his old face; like a fire burnt the feeling of the most intimate love, the humblest veneration in his heart. Deeply, he bowed, touching the ground, before him who was sitting motionlessly, whose smile reminded him of everything he had ever loved in his life, what had ever been valuable and holy to him in his life.